The EU an Evil Union

These United Kingdoms are now, largely against the will of the informed peoples and by the betrayal of our own Politicians and Snivil Cervants a satellite state of the Greater European Empire, broken into emasculated Regions under a Common Purpose, ruled by a corrupt post democratic unelected Dictator Committee of a supra National supreme government in Brussels. We owe this undemocratic malign self serving foreign and very allien government neither loyalty nor obedience. It is not lawfully our government. It is theirs. It is our enemy and part of the greater enemy The New World Order.

Wednesday, 26 October 2011

UKIP MEPs Show No Integrity or Loyalty to Members or The UK it seems!

UKIP MEPs Show No Integrity or Loyalty to Members or The UK it seems!


let none of us forget that Godfrey Bloom was elected as a member of UKIP and that UKIP members have voted 2 to 1 CONCLUSIVELY against its MEPs being members of Pan EU Political Party Groups - Yet Godfrey Bloom is in flagrant disregard being President of One to get himself extra money and a member of another thus lining the pocket of his chum Nigel Farage.

Bloom is himself President of The Pan EU Alliance for Freedom, which is very much alive - it has a website, it has a photograph of presumably UKIP members gathered behind a great banner with UKIP's logo underneath its own, and claims: "The EAF participated in a call by the British people, demanding a referendum". That's hardly 'history'. It was only the day before yesterday!

They demean UKIP and their respective Pan EU Groupings by making such claims!

As to be fair it is hard to see what Bloom's Groups - either The EFD or The PEUAF had to do with the 125,000 signature put to Parliament by Nikki Sinclaire can be belatedly claimed as part of their remit when both Godfrey Bloom and Nigel Farage have received a Court JUDGEMENT against them for their dishonesty and abuse of Nikki Sinclaire seemingly doing almost all they could to aid The EU by effectively trying to sabotage the Petition campaign for a Referendum which won the right to a debate in Westminster and the momentous step forward towards leaving the EU.

What is now essential is to follow up this victory by concentrating on doing the job that UKIP was elected to do in the first place - NOT act as an enrichment source for a small claque forming UKIP Leadership and its parasites.

The job UKIP should have done long ago but is clearly incapable of and thus unfit for purpose is to provide an Exit & Survival Strategy for these United Kingdoms from The EU and educate through training programmes of its members the entire British and Northern Irish electorate in both the benefits AND the reassurance that we can and will suffer no damage nor risk in leaving The EU and repatriating our democracy and restoring our Sovereign Independence as a global trading nation.

One wonders if Bloom's PEP will qualify for 2012 funding and will therefore be gone after the end of this year? That's quite possible. In fact with the vile specimens in UKIP's Pan EU Political Party EFD one wonders how it can survive as clearly it is only held together for the enrichment of the few rather than based upon either the principles, ethics or interests of the many!

We note the extremism, racism, anti Judaism and abuse of homosexuals of Farage's personal cash cow the EFD; also that the Hungarian MEP Krisztina Morvai left the PEUAF at the end of July claiming 'differences' with the Austrian Freedom Party, but which possibly had more to do with the fact that she was also a member of another PEP, the AENM, and funding rules prohibit MEPs from belonging to more than one.

On this count alone one wonders how Bloom passes muster!

Her departure from the PEUAF may well also have left the group short of elected representation in the required minimum seven member states. The EFD would also be hovering around failure on the basis of numbers - although more than enough sordid people live off the EU as elected representatives to the scam not to mention its self serving apparatchiks and over paid over blown demie gods - it seems there are inadequate to sustain more than one extremist group without their falling out on a regular basis, seemingly over their levels of hatred and abuse where self interest in money seems their only real motivation!

Can anyone advise where a listing of these grubby little scams has managed to put in a funding application for next year?

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 - 62 65 62
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< 
General Stuff: 

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide



Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, 21 October 2011

Barbara BOOKER makes some well informed comment on Godfrey BLOOM

Barbara BOOKER makes some well informed comment on Godfrey BLOOM


here is another series of informed comment from Barbara Booker a well informed UKIP observer and one time member of UKIP, who wasnot, so I understand, prepared to renew her membership of UKIP due to its low calliber of leadership, lack of vision a strategy and an exit and survival strategy - also its unprofessionalism and ncorrupt self serving nature of many of its elected officials and their appointed staff.
I see that Junius has drawn attention to the fact that despite UKIP members voting overwhelmingly against their MEPs joining a pan-European political party, Godfrey Bloom not only continues to serve as President of the European Alliance for Freedom but has set up its UK office at The Loft, Vicarage Cottage, Wressle, Selby, YO8 6ET.

The absurdity of Nigel Farage trying to make capital out of the referendum motion (Blind panic in Downing Street - UK Independence Party) - "We know from many polls that a vast majority of people want this referendum" - while one of the MEPs he leads is permitted to disregard the expressed wishes of a vast majority of party members, will not be lost on UKIP. If Godfrey Bloom wants to continue his association with the EAF he can comply with the UKIP poll result by resigning his MEPship. Why hasn't the so-called whip been withdrawn from him for not doing so?

It's not only the insult of being ignored that should concern members who voted against joining a PEP. The EAF is clearly trying to associate itself with UKIP via its website European Alliance for Freedom, with the UKIP logo featuring prominently opposite the EAF logo on a leaflet displayed on the home page. Below this, the link to the EAF's Foundation leads to an extraordinary piece of 'research' posted in the Documents section.

'Roll Call Votes January - July 2010', is introduced as a report "analyzing how UKIP MEPs voted during the period of January 2010 until July 2010 in comparison to the members of the European Alliance for Freedom", and purports to show that EAF members "perceive most of the issues of the European Union in the same way as members of UKIP do". By a ludicrous piece of figure fiddling EAF researchers claim that on a high percentage of occasions "there were always MEPs from EAF who voted in Favour/against or Abstained in exactly the same way UKIP members did".

This is meaningless, since the EAF did not then exist and its future members voted independently of each other, spreading their votes across all three available options. With future EAFs often voting For, Against and/or Abstain on the same occasion, one or more of them could hardly avoid voting the same way as UKIP!

For instance, 14 roll-call votes from January 2010 were analysed. No UKIP MEP voted in favour of any of them, whereas between 1 and 7 future EAFs voted in favour on 12 occasions. UKIP voted against on 8 occasions, with varying numbers of EAFs also voting against on 5 of those. In 13 of the 14 votes UKIP members all voted the same way, with only 1 breaking ranks to abstain on 1 occasion. By contrast, future EAF members all voted the same way on only 3 of the 14 occasions (in each case opposite to UKIP), with their votes split between For and Against on 5 occasions and between 1 and 4 abstaining on 9 occasions. Yet the EAF claims these figures represent 86% votes in common between UKIP and EAF in January!

There are two aspects of this which should concern UKIP members. First, why was the analysis produced at all if not falsely to persuade UKIP that EAF MEPs are fellow travellers who think and vote the same way as UKIP? They are not. As can clearly be seen from the tables, they don't even think and vote the same way as each other! Even now, with the EAF established, they still vote against each other and against UKIP, as can be seen from the latest roll-call votes to appear on the EP website, those of 13 October.

Secondly, if this ridiculous analysis is an example of the quality of research produced by the EAF's Foundation, it will become a laughing stock amongst those who stumble across it. Remember how Stuart Agnew assured members that joining a PEP would give them a Think Tank (Foundation) that would enable them to "match the likes of Open Europe and the Tories in producing high quality research and policy proposals . . . a Think Tank will help UKIP to punch above its weight and mix it with the Old Parties at an entirely new level".

Not on this showing it wouldn't have! How very fortunate that UKIP members didn't allow themselves to be conned.

They should remain vigilant, however
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, 20 October 2011

Godfrey BLOOM Clearly acts against the wishes of UKIP's National Membership

Godfrey BLOOM Clearly acts against the wishes of UKIP's National Membership

Godfrey Bloom spits in the face of the UKIP membership

The UKIP membership may have rejected the concept of Pan-European political parties, but that has not stopped good old Godders. The European Alliance for Freedom seems to have a new address in the Godmeister's constituency, in Selby indeed!

But even more interesting is this missive from the Neo-Nazi Vlaams Belaang, in which they discuss their own membership of the EAF, even naming Godders as President of this Pan-European party.

Taken from The Flemish Republic, newsletter of the Vlaams Belang:

Philip Claeys, member of the European Parliament for the Vlaams Belang, joined the recently established European Alliance for Freedom (EAF), a pan-European alliance of Members of the European Parliament, together with national and regional parliamentarians and parties, united under a political platform calling for national freedom and democracy in opposition to centralised, supranational control. Th EAF is one of eleven ‘European Political Parties at a European Level’ and is partially funded by the European Parliament.

The EAF advocates the right of individuals and peoples to freedom and selfdetermination. Its main objective is to safeguard and strengthen fundamental democratic principles and accountable representation towards effective individual and national freedom.

It therefore commits itself to the following objectives:

• to campaign for a non-centralised, transparent, flexible and democratically controlled EU towards the rejection of any development leading to a European superstate, given that there is no such thing as a ‘single European people’;

• to pursue true subsidiarity and selfrule ensuring that democracy is preserved on the basis of sovereign parliaments in Member States, over which the citizens exercise democratic control;

• to sustain diversity and accountable cooperation at a European level among free peoples able to regulate themselves in accordance with mutually agreed common standards;

• to uphold freedom of political expression and association across Europe and especially within the structures of the EU;

• to promote a political environment in which movements, political parties and other political organisations are given equal opportunities to voice their concerns and advance their political positions;

• to ensure that the peoples and nations of Europe are allowed to pursue their right to strengthen their own historical, traditional, religious and cultural values to defend civil liberties and ensure that no characteristics of a totalitarian nature emerge in the continuing political development of the European Union, while identifying already existing anti-democratic legislation with an aim to revoke it.

Other members of the European Alliance for Freedom include its president Godfrey Bloom (UK IndependenceParty), Franz Obermayr and Andreas Mölzer (Austrian FPÖ), Kent Ekeroth (Sweden Democrats), Thorsten Gross (Bürger in Wut, Germany), Rolandas Paksas and Juozas Imbrasas (Lithuanian Order and Justice party).

Enhanced by Zemanta