The EU an Evil Union

These United Kingdoms are now, largely against the will of the informed peoples and by the betrayal of our own Politicians and Snivil Cervants a satellite state of the Greater European Empire, broken into emasculated Regions under a Common Purpose, ruled by a corrupt post democratic unelected Dictator Committee of a supra National supreme government in Brussels. We owe this undemocratic malign self serving foreign and very allien government neither loyalty nor obedience. It is not lawfully our government. It is theirs. It is our enemy and part of the greater enemy The New World Order.
Showing posts with label Godfrey BLOOM UKIP MEP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Godfrey BLOOM UKIP MEP. Show all posts

Friday, 23 November 2012

UKip Right Wing Extremist Allegiances!

UKip Right Wing Extremist Allegiances!

Hi,

You will I am sure find this YouTube video of interest!


http://youtu.be/hauR-4sNUMc

Particularly followers of UKip who seek to deny their far right and racist associations and alliances!

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW
 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 26 October 2011

UKIP MEPs Show No Integrity or Loyalty to Members or The UK it seems!

UKIP MEPs Show No Integrity or Loyalty to Members or The UK it seems!

Hi,

let none of us forget that Godfrey Bloom was elected as a member of UKIP and that UKIP members have voted 2 to 1 CONCLUSIVELY against its MEPs being members of Pan EU Political Party Groups - Yet Godfrey Bloom is in flagrant disregard being President of One to get himself extra money and a member of another thus lining the pocket of his chum Nigel Farage.

Bloom is himself President of The Pan EU Alliance for Freedom, which is very much alive - it has a website, it has a photograph of presumably UKIP members gathered behind a great banner with UKIP's logo underneath its own, and claims: "The EAF participated in a call by the British people, demanding a referendum". That's hardly 'history'. It was only the day before yesterday!

They demean UKIP and their respective Pan EU Groupings by making such claims!


As to be fair it is hard to see what Bloom's Groups - either The EFD or The PEUAF had to do with the 125,000 signature put to Parliament by Nikki Sinclaire can be belatedly claimed as part of their remit when both Godfrey Bloom and Nigel Farage have received a Court JUDGEMENT against them for their dishonesty and abuse of Nikki Sinclaire seemingly doing almost all they could to aid The EU by effectively trying to sabotage the Petition campaign for a Referendum which won the right to a debate in Westminster and the momentous step forward towards leaving the EU.

What is now essential is to follow up this victory by concentrating on doing the job that UKIP was elected to do in the first place - NOT act as an enrichment source for a small claque forming UKIP Leadership and its parasites.


The job UKIP should have done long ago but is clearly incapable of and thus unfit for purpose is to provide an Exit & Survival Strategy for these United Kingdoms from The EU and educate through training programmes of its members the entire British and Northern Irish electorate in both the benefits AND the reassurance that we can and will suffer no damage nor risk in leaving The EU and repatriating our democracy and restoring our Sovereign Independence as a global trading nation.

One wonders if Bloom's PEP will qualify for 2012 funding and will therefore be gone after the end of this year? That's quite possible. In fact with the vile specimens in UKIP's Pan EU Political Party EFD one wonders how it can survive as clearly it is only held together for the enrichment of the few rather than based upon either the principles, ethics or interests of the many!

We note the extremism, racism, anti Judaism and abuse of homosexuals of Farage's personal cash cow the EFD; also that the Hungarian MEP Krisztina Morvai left the PEUAF at the end of July claiming 'differences' with the Austrian Freedom Party, but which possibly had more to do with the fact that she was also a member of another PEP, the AENM, and funding rules prohibit MEPs from belonging to more than one.

On this count alone one wonders how Bloom passes muster!

Her departure from the PEUAF may well also have left the group short of elected representation in the required minimum seven member states. The EFD would also be hovering around failure on the basis of numbers - although more than enough sordid people live off the EU as elected representatives to the scam not to mention its self serving apparatchiks and over paid over blown demie gods - it seems there are inadequate to sustain more than one extremist group without their falling out on a regular basis, seemingly over their levels of hatred and abuse where self interest in money seems their only real motivation!

Can anyone advise where a listing of these grubby little scams has managed to put in a funding application for next year?

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 - 62 65 62
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< 
Also:
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com 
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of


&


Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, 21 October 2011

Barbara BOOKER makes some well informed comment on Godfrey BLOOM

Barbara BOOKER makes some well informed comment on Godfrey BLOOM

Hi,

here is another series of informed comment from Barbara Booker a well informed UKIP observer and one time member of UKIP, who wasnot, so I understand, prepared to renew her membership of UKIP due to its low calliber of leadership, lack of vision a strategy and an exit and survival strategy - also its unprofessionalism and ncorrupt self serving nature of many of its elected officials and their appointed staff.
I see that Junius has drawn attention to the fact that despite UKIP members voting overwhelmingly against their MEPs joining a pan-European political party, Godfrey Bloom not only continues to serve as President of the European Alliance for Freedom but has set up its UK office at The Loft, Vicarage Cottage, Wressle, Selby, YO8 6ET.

The absurdity of Nigel Farage trying to make capital out of the referendum motion (Blind panic in Downing Street - UK Independence Party) - "We know from many polls that a vast majority of people want this referendum" - while one of the MEPs he leads is permitted to disregard the expressed wishes of a vast majority of party members, will not be lost on UKIP. If Godfrey Bloom wants to continue his association with the EAF he can comply with the UKIP poll result by resigning his MEPship. Why hasn't the so-called whip been withdrawn from him for not doing so?

It's not only the insult of being ignored that should concern members who voted against joining a PEP. The EAF is clearly trying to associate itself with UKIP via its website European Alliance for Freedom, with the UKIP logo featuring prominently opposite the EAF logo on a leaflet displayed on the home page. Below this, the link to the EAF's Foundation leads to an extraordinary piece of 'research' posted in the Documents section.

'Roll Call Votes January - July 2010', is introduced as a report "analyzing how UKIP MEPs voted during the period of January 2010 until July 2010 in comparison to the members of the European Alliance for Freedom", and purports to show that EAF members "perceive most of the issues of the European Union in the same way as members of UKIP do". By a ludicrous piece of figure fiddling EAF researchers claim that on a high percentage of occasions "there were always MEPs from EAF who voted in Favour/against or Abstained in exactly the same way UKIP members did".

This is meaningless, since the EAF did not then exist and its future members voted independently of each other, spreading their votes across all three available options. With future EAFs often voting For, Against and/or Abstain on the same occasion, one or more of them could hardly avoid voting the same way as UKIP!

For instance, 14 roll-call votes from January 2010 were analysed. No UKIP MEP voted in favour of any of them, whereas between 1 and 7 future EAFs voted in favour on 12 occasions. UKIP voted against on 8 occasions, with varying numbers of EAFs also voting against on 5 of those. In 13 of the 14 votes UKIP members all voted the same way, with only 1 breaking ranks to abstain on 1 occasion. By contrast, future EAF members all voted the same way on only 3 of the 14 occasions (in each case opposite to UKIP), with their votes split between For and Against on 5 occasions and between 1 and 4 abstaining on 9 occasions. Yet the EAF claims these figures represent 86% votes in common between UKIP and EAF in January!

There are two aspects of this which should concern UKIP members. First, why was the analysis produced at all if not falsely to persuade UKIP that EAF MEPs are fellow travellers who think and vote the same way as UKIP? They are not. As can clearly be seen from the tables, they don't even think and vote the same way as each other! Even now, with the EAF established, they still vote against each other and against UKIP, as can be seen from the latest roll-call votes to appear on the EP website http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/...EN&language=EN, those of 13 October.

Secondly, if this ridiculous analysis is an example of the quality of research produced by the EAF's Foundation, it will become a laughing stock amongst those who stumble across it. Remember how Stuart Agnew assured members that joining a PEP would give them a Think Tank (Foundation) that would enable them to "match the likes of Open Europe and the Tories in producing high quality research and policy proposals . . . a Think Tank will help UKIP to punch above its weight and mix it with the Old Parties at an entirely new level".

Not on this showing it wouldn't have! How very fortunate that UKIP members didn't allow themselves to be conned.

They should remain vigilant, however
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 11 July 2011

IS THIS PEPP STILL LEGITIMATE? 11-Jul-2011

IS THIS PEPP STILL LEGITIMATE? 11-Jul-2011

Godfrey Bloom, Member of the European Parliame...Image via WikipediaGodfrey BLOOM MEP Drunk, homophobe& without morality or ethics.

Hi,

one is inclined to speculate as to whether this PEPP is still legitimate in the light of the comments of Barbara Booker.

It is also worth noting that The EFD group is teetering on the edge of collapse as the 3 UKIP MEPs of any visible morality and integrity have quit the extremist group wishing to stand as Unattached in The EU's so called parliament rather than be seen to be associated with the extremism, racism, anti Jewish and anti homosexual pro EU membership and some of its particularly vile members.

With the rejection of an offer from Farage, in an attempt to regain the numbers and nationalities required for their continuance the small group of Dutch MEPs have recently rejected the offer rather than be shackled to the vile EFD group.

This would seem to leave The Pan EU Alliance for Freedom (EAF) in competition, if expansion or even stabilisation is required, fishing in the same filthy pond with the same bottom feeders on offer to both - The BNP, Vlams Belang, Jobbik or perhaps The Austrians from what was Jorg Heyder's Party, which is best known for his death in a car crash, or the extreme right wing Nationalist Le Pen family party in France.

Any of these may well be suited to join the extremist groups but it will be a dual of egos and greed by the look of it!

As Barbara Booker said earlier today:
Before getting too deeply into discussion about the statutes of the EAF, it might be an idea to check with Godfrey Bloom whether that party has already collapsed.

When its website first went live it listed under 'About EAF', seven EU countries - the minimum number required for a PEPP - from which its members were drawn. It now states only six, the missing one being Hungary.

This may or may not be significant. Certainly, small PEPPs like the EAF are very vulnerable, especially when one or more of their qualifying members is from a national parliament or assembly where national elections could deprive them of their seats at any time. However, the EAF's Hungarian representative is/was the MEP Krisztina Morvai, a controversial figure (BNP's European parliament ally Krisztina Morvai axed from London conference after protests | Politics | The Observer Outrage over obscene anti-Semitic Internet post by Morvai | Politics.hu) who may still be a member, though airbrushed from the website possibly to avoid alarming UKIP members about to vote on whether their MEPs should join her in the EAF!

Wikipedia, updated four days ago, still has her as a EAF member, and she gave interviews on 3 and 5 July (see Hungarian Ambiance) confirming her membership and claiming that she was invited by the EAF to join it. This is odd, since Wiki also has the three Jobbik MEPs, of which she is one, as members of the Alliance of European National Movements, a pan-European party which the BNP claims will qualify for a PEPP grant from January 2012 Jobbik. I don't think MEPs are allowed to belong to more than one grant-claiming PEPP at a time.

No doubt Godfrey Bloom can clarify Dr Morvai's current membership status, although bearing in mind her alliance with the BNP and Bloom's own unequivocal condemnation of association with that party (press release 'UKIP smash BNP plot and expel infiltrators' 5.2.04: Bloom, "Their views will simply not be tolerated within UKIP"), he might have some difficulty explaining how he came to be forming a PEPP with her in the first place!
It is also worthy of note that it is rather fudging the figures for Farage's squalid EFD Group if Bloom is offering his name to keep it going whilst in bed with the new extreme grouping.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, 9 November 2010

UKIP: Ms Bonici, Farage and the Pan-European Alliance

UKIP: Ms Bonici, Farage and the Pan-European Alliance


Sharon Ellul Bonici, front woman for Nigel Farage's new pan-European political party, and Maltese Marxist candidate in last year's Euro-elections, has urged the EU to accept a Libyan proposal on immigration, and has voiced her support for the EU's "FRONTEX" border management project based in Warsaw.

She said in a statement that the EU should be able to spare a billion euros towards effectively solving the problem.

Ms. Ellul Bonici welcomed Libya's proposal for a $1 billion in EU aid in exchange for collaboration to stem illegal immigration.

"Some people are saying this is blackmail on Libya's part, but I don't see it that way. Combating illegal immigration is costly. The EU should take this opportunity and make sure it paves the way towards a readmission agreement with Libya," Ms. Ellul Bonici added.

"Then it should strengthen Frontex in order to patrol the EU border and deal with the whole process itself - from asylum applications to readmission and reallocation...íf it takes another billion towards solving this problem it would be a billion well spent" she concluded.

Now we might argue that such political naiveté is a charming little cameo of an island on which compulsory schooling is a relatively new concept. However it is not something that we in the UK might welcome, and in particular the centre-right membership of UKIP might wonder why a UKIP MEP is employing a person who subscribes to such left-wing views. It is the case that UKIP's resident clown, Godfrey Bloom, who left the financial services industry in disgrace after attracting a whopping great fine for his company, is indeed employing Ms. Ellul Bonici as the nominal secretary of Nigel Farage's latest money-spinning pan-European initiative. Of course, this is not a decision that Bloom would have reached on his own - he is Farage's ho, and he does as he is told.

Also see: LINK & LINK
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 3 November 2010

So The New BONICI Construct 'Alliance For Freedom' is pro EU Membership as Reformists!

So The New BONICI Construct 'Alliance For Freedom' is pro EU Membership as Reformists!

Hi,


may I take the lioberty of pointing out just how glibly Sharon Ellul - BONICI uses the term EUroRealist!

Mrs. ELLUL is clearly, from her own comments, pro EU membership and NOT a withdrawalist - it is interesting to note that Godfrey Bloom as a UKIP MEP was elected on the claims that he was a withdrawalist and wished to represent the views of those who wished to leave.


Now I note Godfrey Bloom is no longer interested in leaving The EU but supports Mrs. Sharon Ellul - BONICI who has said:

On the EU referendum
Five years ago, the people were faced with an option: either to join the EU, or not to join. For my part I argued that we should not join, because membership would be detrimental to Malta. As for the referendum, I always wanted to respect that vote...
MaltaToday, February 2009
 
On withdrawing from the EU
I personally disagree: in fact I think it would be political suicide. The damage to our international reputation would be irreversible. We would project the image of an unreliable nation that can’t make up its own mind. This in turn would diminish our standing in international fora... which would negatively affect foreign investment... and ultimately, the citizens would suffer.”
MaltaToday, February 2009
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, 29 October 2010

British Democracy Forum PLAYING CATCH-UP ON UKIP NEWS! 29-Oct-2010

#1
Trusted Member Barboo is doing well

Join Date
Mar 2007
Posts
715

Default European Alliance for Freedom

GLW has a posted a memo from Tim Congdon re the creation of a new pan-European party to be called 'European Alliance for Freedom', and UKIP's possible involvement in this project. Included in the memo is an e-mail from a Sharon Ellul Bonici stating that the European Alliance hopes to become strong in the 2014 Euro-elections, and that MEPs can join either as a Party or as individuals. Godfrey Bloom is listed among those who have confirmed their intention of doing so.

UKIP MEPs sought election on an unequivocal platform of withdrawal from the EU. It is what party members and supporters worked for, contributed funds for, and what the electorate voted for. 'Campaign policies Euro elections 2009', posted to UKIP's website on 8 May 2009, stated: "The UK Independence Party believes that the UK should withdraw from the European Union". 'Campaign letter from UKIP Leader Nigel Farage MEP', posted 11 May 2009, began: "The UK Independence Party is the only moderate, democratic party to advocate Britain's withdrawal from the European Union", and continued: "On June 4, please lend us your vote. Say No to European Union and help UKIP ensure that the future of our nation is decided by those of us who live here. There can surely no longer be any question that Britain would be better off out".

Withdrawal from the EU was and still is UKIP's policy and principle aim, and its MEPs have no mandate from the party or the electorate to sit in the European parliament and speak, vote on or represent anything else.

UKIP MEPs' alliance with those of other, non-withdrawalist, parties in their EP group has always been contentious, but the nature of EP groupings is a loose one whereby the parliament's rules assume (but do not require proof of) political affinity between group members, unless they state otherwise. In addition, the EFD's political platform is vague and allows its different delegations the freedom to vote as they see fit, a freedom which is taken full advantage of with other EFD members frequently voting in favour of motions on which UKIP's MEPs abstain or vote against.

This will not apply to members of a pan-EU party, and those who join the European Alliance will not simply be 'assumed' to have political affinity. In order to be approved as a political party and granted EP funding they will have to agree common objectives and draw up a political programme to work to, which they will have to submit with their funding application. Any change to that programme must be notified to the parliament or the funding will be suspended.

None of the parties or individuals named in the Bonici e-mail, other than Godfrey Bloom, are withdrawalists. They are reformists who wish to remain in the EU and whose political programme will reflect that intention. Even the name adopted by the new party makes no reference to independence or anything else that might suggest withdrawal. Indeed, a European Alliance for Freedom does no more than echo the EU's own description of itself as 'an area of freedom, security and justice'. Any UKIP MEPs joining this party will in effect have crossed the floor to pursue political objectives for which they have no mandate.

They cannot in these circumstances continue to be regarded as UKIP MEPs, and for the party to keep faith with its members and its electorate it will have to expel any MEP who joins the European Alliance for Freedom.
To view the original on what was The UKIP Forum now risibly called The British Democracy Forum CLICK HERE
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 27 October 2010

Prof. Tim CONGDON, Gerard BATTEN UKIP MEP, COMMENTS on BETRAYAL 27-Oct-2010

Prof. Tim CONGDON, Gerard BATTEN UKIP MEP, COMMENTS on BETRAYAL 27-Oct-2010

Could even the UK Independence Party be bribed in this way? Of course not, you might say. Well, unfortunately it's a little more complicated. The last few weeks have seen rumours that a new pan-European political party would be formed, with the UK Independence Party (or at any rate UKIP MEPs) being invited to join. I have been hoping that these rumours were untrue. But an e-mail has been sent to UKIP MEPs by a lady called Sharon Bonici and, if I have read it correctly, it is a clear-cut invitation to participate in the development of a pan-European political party. I understand that it has been sent to UKIP MEPs. Indeed, the e-mail says that Mr. Godfrey Bloom has "confirmed" that he does wish to participate in the new pan-European political party, to be known as "the European Alliance". 


I stand open to correction (and would in fact like to be wrong), but my interpretation of the Bonici e-mail is that extra money will be made available to the MEPs of national parties - not necessarily to their salaries, of course - who decide to belong to the European Alliance. Perhaps Ms. Bonici - to whom I suppose this e-mail will be forwarded - might like to repudiate that suggestion, if it is untrue.

For myself, I would like to reiterate what I have said throughout the 2010 election campaign for the leadership of the UK Independence Party, that
1. I do not want to be a MEP,
2. I intend to finance from my own resources (up to £100,000 a year) a London-based office which is to concentrate on the organization of UKIP political campaigning in the UK, and
3. The centre of gravity of the UK Independence Party must be in the UK.
At the Torquay party conference in September I supported the motion, proposed by Steph McWilliam, that the party membership must be consuulted on the question of UKIP's involvement in a pan-European political party. As is well-known in party circles, Nigel Farage opposed the motion. The motion was in fact carried overwhelmingly. In my view, the party membership must be consulted on a possible development of this kind, which is basic to the purpose and definition of the UK Independence Party, and even in fact to its very name.

Gerard Batten MEP has sent me an e-mail to say that he will respect and abide by the Torquay conference motion.

I hope that all three other candidates in the current leadership election will confirm that they will abide by the Torquay conference vote on this subject and, more generally, will respect the principle of party democracy.

Memo on an e-mail from Sharon Bonici to interested individuals (including UKIP MEPs) about a new pan-European party, to be called “the European Alliance I have highlighted key passages of the e-mail in red. Note that the e-mail refers to:

1. The proposed new party, to be called “the European Alliance”, without clarifying whether – for example – existing Eurosceptic parties, such as the UK Independence Party, are to keep their present names in future elections.

2. The alleged urgency of making a decision about participation in such a pan-European party. (To whom and what are the “paper work” to be handed in? The question is basic.)

3. “European funds” being made “available to us”. (From whom are such funds coming? The European Parliament? Assume that the funds come from the European Parliament. Then – in the event that UKIP MEPs were to participate in “the European Alliance” – their activities would be funded by the European Parliament, an institution avowedly central to the project of European integration.)

4. The possibility of the “consent” of party members, the meaning of which is (to me at least) unclear, but may intended as a fig-leaf to pacify those UKIP members who at the 2010 Torquay party conference voted overwhelmingly that the issue of pan-European parties must be decided by the party membership.

5. Godfrey Bloom, as already confirming his wish to participate in the European Alliance project. (Mr. Bloom is said to be “EFD”, not “UKIP”. EFD stands, of course, for “Europe of Freedom and Democracy”, the existing pan-European grouping to which a majority of UKIP MEPs are attached.)

6. A closing line, in which the European Parliament is acknowledged as having the power “to approve the new Alliance”. This is – almost certainly – the power to approve the Alliance, meaning the power to approve the Alliance in order to establish the Alliance’s eligibility for various monies from the European Parliament because it meets certain criteria of pan-European-ness. 


These notes prepared by Tim Congdon on 27th October, 2010.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, 26 October 2010

Sharon Ellul BONICI Announces UKIP's Inclusion - Members @ 26-Oct-2010

From: European Alliance For Freedom [mailto:europeanallianceforfreedom@gmail.com]
Sent:
26 October 2010 12:57
To: xxxxxxx
Subject: European Alliance For Freedom
Dear xxxxxxxxxxx,

 We are currently setting up
a new European Alliance and most members I spoke to who are joining or joined would really like to see you on board. I would like to set up a meeting with you to discuss and hope to get your interest in being part of this new poject. I will be in parliament today Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday this week and would appreciate if we can meet up at your convenience. We need to hand in all the paper work and signautres by the end of the week, so this is a bit urgent.

The
Alliance will serve to build campaigns across Europe to promote various causes; For example one of the first campaings we can engage ourselves in is to generate 1 million signatures to be able to instigate a pan wide European referendum on Turkey. The idea is to use the million signature clause according to the Lisbon Treaty.

We can build a multilingual website for people to sign up and advertise it in every member state. This will automatically gives us a huge database of Eurosceptics and people across
Europe with the same ideology. In time we need to campaign again on another issue we can engage these people on various campaigns and keep the Commission on their toes.

We will print research publication in various languages.

The Alliance will help parties dissiminate information by using European funds available to us, and if we don't apply the other Parties/Alliances such as the PES, EPP, Greens etc... will have the money which is allocated to us to share between them. Basically it is like giving ammunition to your enemy for free.

The
Alliance can finance various campaigns in your country if you are members with billboards, TV adverts,newspaper adverts,leaflets etc...or any other campaigns you decide you want to do in your country.

The Alliance will not get involved politically in any country without the consent of its members.

You can join as a Party or as individual members of the European Parliament. We would like to have you as our Danish representitives on board and our aim is to have representation in every European country including those that are not EU members such as
Iceland, Norway and Switzerland. We also hope that in the next European Elections we can become a strong voice in the European Parliament in 2014

So far we have the following confirmed -

1.Godfrey Bloom MEP - UK (UK- EFD)

2.Sweden Democrats - Sweden 20 MP's in the national parliament

3.BIW - Germany - 1 member in the regional parliament

4.Frank Van Hecke MEP- Belgium
   Philip Claeys MEP

5. Paksas Rolandas MEP (EFD)
    Imbraras Juozas MEP
 
 Still to confirm or be confirmed -

6. PVV - Nederlands

7.Provero Fiorello MEP - (Italy -EFD)
8.Paska Jaroslav  MEP- (Slovakia -EFD)

9.Fiorello Provera MEP -(Italy -EFD)
We do have other parties and members who are interested but at the moment we would like to take it step by step until we apply and everything is set with like minded people.

I thank you for your time and attention, should you wish for more info do not hesitiate to contact me by email or on
Mobile: xxxxxxxxxx.

Hope to receive a positive reply and to have you on board this new venture.

Attached please find a copy of the statute and an application form. For the moment everything is provisional and subject to change in the first congress
if we are approved by parliament as a new Alliance.

Best Regards,
Sharon Ellul Bonici
Enhanced by Zemanta