The EU an Evil Union

These United Kingdoms are now, largely against the will of the informed peoples and by the betrayal of our own Politicians and Snivil Cervants a satellite state of the Greater European Empire, broken into emasculated Regions under a Common Purpose, ruled by a corrupt post democratic unelected Dictator Committee of a supra National supreme government in Brussels. We owe this undemocratic malign self serving foreign and very allien government neither loyalty nor obedience. It is not lawfully our government. It is theirs. It is our enemy and part of the greater enemy The New World Order.
Showing posts with label UKIP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UKIP. Show all posts

Friday, 23 November 2012

UKip Right Wing Extremist Allegiances!

UKip Right Wing Extremist Allegiances!

Hi,

You will I am sure find this YouTube video of interest!


http://youtu.be/hauR-4sNUMc

Particularly followers of UKip who seek to deny their far right and racist associations and alliances!

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW
 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, 3 July 2012

UKIP's far-right links exposed as a driving force!

UKIP's far-right links exposed as a driving force!


UKIP's far-right links exposed



From The Centre of European Politics:

UKIP in alliance with Marine Le Pen and the Austrian Freedom Party

UKIP has always denied any alliance with the extreme right but here we have the evidence. Godfrey Bloom MEP has set up a transnational party with the French National Front, Austrian Freedom Party, and Flemish Interest.

The European Alliance for Freedom (www.eurallfree.org) received just under € 373,000 from the EU budget under the EU party statute in 2011:

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdf/grants/grant_amounts_parties.pdf

The Alliance’s President is Godfrey Bloom, while other board members include MEPs from the Austrian Freedom Party and the Flemish extreme right. The French National Front has revealed that both UKIP and Marine Le Pen are members of the Alliance:

http://www.frontnational.com/2012/01/marine-le-pen-en-autriche/

Here is a translation into English from the National Front’s press release of 27 January 2012 – note the last sentence of the second paragraph:

‘Marine Le Pen will visit Vienna this Friday 27 January at the invitation of the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) and the European Alliance for Freedom (EAF). She will meet various political figures as well as the leaders of patriotic movements in Europe. She will then proceed to the Austrian National Assembly where she will be received by one its presidents as well as by the parliamentary group of the FPÖ.

‘Marine Le Pen joined the European Alliance for Freedom last October. This pan-European platform was founded at the end of 2010 and despite its opposition to the European Union such as it is organised at present, has been recognised by the European Parliament. The members of this Alliance have come from the ranks of those movements engaged in the patriotic and sovereignty struggles of our time. They include for example the Austrian FPÖ of Heinz-Christian Strache, the British UKIP of Nigel Farage, as well as other movements coming from Sweden, Flanders, Malta and elsewhere in the future.

‘The day will conclude with Marine Le Pen attending a ball at the Hofburg Imperial Palace in Vienna at the invitation of Heinz-Christian Strache, president of the FPÖ.’

If further proof of the EAF's far right politics were needed here we have a Flemish poster from its website showing a white sheep expelling a Turkish and Moroccan sheep from Flanders:

http://www.eurallfree.org/sites/default/files/VB-leaflet.pdf

Clearly UKIP has some explaining to do. Perhaps the BBC and British political class should apply the same cordon sanitaire to UKIP as applies to the BNP. Should a party that forms transnational alliances with Marine Le Pen and the Austrian Freedom Party not be ostracised?

To read the original: LINK
Sourced at CLICK HERE 
ADDITION on 04-Jul-2012:

Today I felt it apposite to comment on The CEP (Center for EUropean Politics) web site, from whence the article abouve was sourced, my comment has been published:
Hi,

surely no one believes UKIP rhetoric that it is NOT racist, anti Jewish, anti homosexual, self serving, self obsessed, bullying, corrupt and dishonest if not in all aspects at very least by its close associations.

Let us not forget that its only notable politician the media performer Nigel Farage leads The EFD Group in The EU which is not even in favour of withdrawal but in favour of reform of The EU!

Then again is it reasonable to define Farage as leader when he so clearly lacks strategy, tactics or vision and UKIP is very much under his control as a one man band rather than led by him.
To be fair Farage has put UKIP where it is but in doing so has fallen out with almost half his MEPs and despite placing individuals on his NEC has had some spectacular rows in removing those who slipped through and then demanded transparency and accountability, probity and ethics from his management claque.

Perhaps if UKIP is ever to have a meaningful future now is the time for Farage - also a failed banker - to follow the example of Bob Diamond & The Barclays Bank Chairman and fall on his sword.

Even partyed from his money stream as leader Farage would still have a role to play where he at least shows some ability as an entertainer and media bufoon!

Regards,
Greg_L-W.
July 4, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterGreg_L-W.


Make your vote count vote:
INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
or Write on YOUR ballot Paper 
LEAVE-THE-EU

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 4 January 2012

UKIP: Godfrey Bloom, the Far Right & the pro- EU European Alliance for Freedom

UKIP: Godfrey Bloom, the Far Right & the pro- EU European Alliance for Freedom

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of


&

UKIP: Godfrey Bloom, the Far Right & the pro- EU European Alliance for Freedom


The European Alliance for Freedom (EAF) is a pro-EU pan European political party. UKIP MEPs are not allowed to sit in these pro-EU entities following a ballot of members in 2010, but that has not stopped UKIP's Godfrey Bloom from being president of the EAF, where he sits with his fellow board members from the neo-nazi Vlaams Belaang, and the far-right Austrian Freedom Party. So much for the will of the UKIP membership, or the "gibbons" as Bloom calls them.

The EAF is developing, and in true far-right traditions they have held a summer camp for young people, many of whom appear to be who appear to be - well - skinheads. http://www.eurallfree.org/?q=node/208 Nice!
 
And let us not forget the EAF congress, the photographs of which reveal Nigel Farage's assistant Steve Reed sitting next to Vlaams Belang's Phillip Claeys! http://www.eurallfree.org/?q=node/199
The EAF statute is interesting, and it calls into question Bloom's relationship with both the EAF and UKIP. It states: "A member may be expelled for not abiding by the principles and objectives of Article 2 of the statute,"
 
So what is Article 2? This calls "for a non-centralised, transparent, flexible and democratically controlled EU" and wants "to sustain diversity and accountable cooperation at a European level ". It also wants "to uphold freedom of political expression and association across Europe and especially within the structures of the EU;"
 
So why has Bloom not only not been expelled (as he is supposedly a withdrawalist), but also been made president of the EAF?
 
The answer, dear reader, is simple. The anti-EU rhetoric of the UKIP leadership clique is purely for domestic consumption. It is to garner your votes and, more importantly, your money and the salaries that come with being on the EU gravy train.
 
But let us look a little deeper into the EAF. The party is based in Malta (although it has no Maltese politicians amongst its membership), and its representative on the island is one Isabelle Sammut. Ms Sammut is the daughter of Joe Sammut, a Maltese socialist and former treasurer of the Maltese Labour Party. Mr Sammut nailed his colours to the mast when he stated "Everyone agrees that the EU was a very positive development." Mr Sammut's business practices at the moment include helping immigrants obtain Maltese residency so that they can enjoy "Freedom of movement within EU". He can also help you set up a business in Libya where he boasts of long years of success. Interesting.
 
Isabelle is rather young for such a role, she is just 22 years old. Perhaps her name is an administrative matter? We wonder if she is drawing an EU salary, and if so, who trousers it?


Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 - 528 337
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com  
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com  
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com  
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide of OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN & To Leave-The-EU 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 26 October 2011

UKIP MEPs Show No Integrity or Loyalty to Members or The UK it seems!

UKIP MEPs Show No Integrity or Loyalty to Members or The UK it seems!

Hi,

let none of us forget that Godfrey Bloom was elected as a member of UKIP and that UKIP members have voted 2 to 1 CONCLUSIVELY against its MEPs being members of Pan EU Political Party Groups - Yet Godfrey Bloom is in flagrant disregard being President of One to get himself extra money and a member of another thus lining the pocket of his chum Nigel Farage.

Bloom is himself President of The Pan EU Alliance for Freedom, which is very much alive - it has a website, it has a photograph of presumably UKIP members gathered behind a great banner with UKIP's logo underneath its own, and claims: "The EAF participated in a call by the British people, demanding a referendum". That's hardly 'history'. It was only the day before yesterday!

They demean UKIP and their respective Pan EU Groupings by making such claims!


As to be fair it is hard to see what Bloom's Groups - either The EFD or The PEUAF had to do with the 125,000 signature put to Parliament by Nikki Sinclaire can be belatedly claimed as part of their remit when both Godfrey Bloom and Nigel Farage have received a Court JUDGEMENT against them for their dishonesty and abuse of Nikki Sinclaire seemingly doing almost all they could to aid The EU by effectively trying to sabotage the Petition campaign for a Referendum which won the right to a debate in Westminster and the momentous step forward towards leaving the EU.

What is now essential is to follow up this victory by concentrating on doing the job that UKIP was elected to do in the first place - NOT act as an enrichment source for a small claque forming UKIP Leadership and its parasites.


The job UKIP should have done long ago but is clearly incapable of and thus unfit for purpose is to provide an Exit & Survival Strategy for these United Kingdoms from The EU and educate through training programmes of its members the entire British and Northern Irish electorate in both the benefits AND the reassurance that we can and will suffer no damage nor risk in leaving The EU and repatriating our democracy and restoring our Sovereign Independence as a global trading nation.

One wonders if Bloom's PEP will qualify for 2012 funding and will therefore be gone after the end of this year? That's quite possible. In fact with the vile specimens in UKIP's Pan EU Political Party EFD one wonders how it can survive as clearly it is only held together for the enrichment of the few rather than based upon either the principles, ethics or interests of the many!

We note the extremism, racism, anti Judaism and abuse of homosexuals of Farage's personal cash cow the EFD; also that the Hungarian MEP Krisztina Morvai left the PEUAF at the end of July claiming 'differences' with the Austrian Freedom Party, but which possibly had more to do with the fact that she was also a member of another PEP, the AENM, and funding rules prohibit MEPs from belonging to more than one.

On this count alone one wonders how Bloom passes muster!

Her departure from the PEUAF may well also have left the group short of elected representation in the required minimum seven member states. The EFD would also be hovering around failure on the basis of numbers - although more than enough sordid people live off the EU as elected representatives to the scam not to mention its self serving apparatchiks and over paid over blown demie gods - it seems there are inadequate to sustain more than one extremist group without their falling out on a regular basis, seemingly over their levels of hatred and abuse where self interest in money seems their only real motivation!

Can anyone advise where a listing of these grubby little scams has managed to put in a funding application for next year?

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 - 62 65 62
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< 
Also:
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com 
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of


&


Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, 21 October 2011

Barbara BOOKER makes some well informed comment on Godfrey BLOOM

Barbara BOOKER makes some well informed comment on Godfrey BLOOM

Hi,

here is another series of informed comment from Barbara Booker a well informed UKIP observer and one time member of UKIP, who wasnot, so I understand, prepared to renew her membership of UKIP due to its low calliber of leadership, lack of vision a strategy and an exit and survival strategy - also its unprofessionalism and ncorrupt self serving nature of many of its elected officials and their appointed staff.
I see that Junius has drawn attention to the fact that despite UKIP members voting overwhelmingly against their MEPs joining a pan-European political party, Godfrey Bloom not only continues to serve as President of the European Alliance for Freedom but has set up its UK office at The Loft, Vicarage Cottage, Wressle, Selby, YO8 6ET.

The absurdity of Nigel Farage trying to make capital out of the referendum motion (Blind panic in Downing Street - UK Independence Party) - "We know from many polls that a vast majority of people want this referendum" - while one of the MEPs he leads is permitted to disregard the expressed wishes of a vast majority of party members, will not be lost on UKIP. If Godfrey Bloom wants to continue his association with the EAF he can comply with the UKIP poll result by resigning his MEPship. Why hasn't the so-called whip been withdrawn from him for not doing so?

It's not only the insult of being ignored that should concern members who voted against joining a PEP. The EAF is clearly trying to associate itself with UKIP via its website European Alliance for Freedom, with the UKIP logo featuring prominently opposite the EAF logo on a leaflet displayed on the home page. Below this, the link to the EAF's Foundation leads to an extraordinary piece of 'research' posted in the Documents section.

'Roll Call Votes January - July 2010', is introduced as a report "analyzing how UKIP MEPs voted during the period of January 2010 until July 2010 in comparison to the members of the European Alliance for Freedom", and purports to show that EAF members "perceive most of the issues of the European Union in the same way as members of UKIP do". By a ludicrous piece of figure fiddling EAF researchers claim that on a high percentage of occasions "there were always MEPs from EAF who voted in Favour/against or Abstained in exactly the same way UKIP members did".

This is meaningless, since the EAF did not then exist and its future members voted independently of each other, spreading their votes across all three available options. With future EAFs often voting For, Against and/or Abstain on the same occasion, one or more of them could hardly avoid voting the same way as UKIP!

For instance, 14 roll-call votes from January 2010 were analysed. No UKIP MEP voted in favour of any of them, whereas between 1 and 7 future EAFs voted in favour on 12 occasions. UKIP voted against on 8 occasions, with varying numbers of EAFs also voting against on 5 of those. In 13 of the 14 votes UKIP members all voted the same way, with only 1 breaking ranks to abstain on 1 occasion. By contrast, future EAF members all voted the same way on only 3 of the 14 occasions (in each case opposite to UKIP), with their votes split between For and Against on 5 occasions and between 1 and 4 abstaining on 9 occasions. Yet the EAF claims these figures represent 86% votes in common between UKIP and EAF in January!

There are two aspects of this which should concern UKIP members. First, why was the analysis produced at all if not falsely to persuade UKIP that EAF MEPs are fellow travellers who think and vote the same way as UKIP? They are not. As can clearly be seen from the tables, they don't even think and vote the same way as each other! Even now, with the EAF established, they still vote against each other and against UKIP, as can be seen from the latest roll-call votes to appear on the EP website http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/...EN&language=EN, those of 13 October.

Secondly, if this ridiculous analysis is an example of the quality of research produced by the EAF's Foundation, it will become a laughing stock amongst those who stumble across it. Remember how Stuart Agnew assured members that joining a PEP would give them a Think Tank (Foundation) that would enable them to "match the likes of Open Europe and the Tories in producing high quality research and policy proposals . . . a Think Tank will help UKIP to punch above its weight and mix it with the Old Parties at an entirely new level".

Not on this showing it wouldn't have! How very fortunate that UKIP members didn't allow themselves to be conned.

They should remain vigilant, however
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, 20 October 2011

Godfrey BLOOM Clearly acts against the wishes of UKIP's National Membership

Godfrey BLOOM Clearly acts against the wishes of UKIP's National Membership

Godfrey Bloom spits in the face of the UKIP membership


The UKIP membership may have rejected the concept of Pan-European political parties, but that has not stopped good old Godders. The European Alliance for Freedom seems to have a new address in the Godmeister's constituency, in Selby indeed! http://www.eurallfree.org/?q=node/65

But even more interesting is this missive from the Neo-Nazi Vlaams Belaang, in which they discuss their own membership of the EAF, even naming Godders as President of this Pan-European party.
Nice.....!

Taken from The Flemish Republic, newsletter of the Vlaams Belang:

Philip Claeys, member of the European Parliament for the Vlaams Belang, joined the recently established European Alliance for Freedom (EAF), a pan-European alliance of Members of the European Parliament, together with national and regional parliamentarians and parties, united under a political platform calling for national freedom and democracy in opposition to centralised, supranational control. Th EAF is one of eleven ‘European Political Parties at a European Level’ and is partially funded by the European Parliament.


The EAF advocates the right of individuals and peoples to freedom and selfdetermination. Its main objective is to safeguard and strengthen fundamental democratic principles and accountable representation towards effective individual and national freedom.


It therefore commits itself to the following objectives:


• to campaign for a non-centralised, transparent, flexible and democratically controlled EU towards the rejection of any development leading to a European superstate, given that there is no such thing as a ‘single European people’;


• to pursue true subsidiarity and selfrule ensuring that democracy is preserved on the basis of sovereign parliaments in Member States, over which the citizens exercise democratic control;


• to sustain diversity and accountable cooperation at a European level among free peoples able to regulate themselves in accordance with mutually agreed common standards;


• to uphold freedom of political expression and association across Europe and especially within the structures of the EU;


• to promote a political environment in which movements, political parties and other political organisations are given equal opportunities to voice their concerns and advance their political positions;

• to ensure that the peoples and nations of Europe are allowed to pursue their right to strengthen their own historical, traditional, religious and cultural values to defend civil liberties and ensure that no characteristics of a totalitarian nature emerge in the continuing political development of the European Union, while identifying already existing anti-democratic legislation with an aim to revoke it.


Other members of the European Alliance for Freedom include its president Godfrey Bloom (UK IndependenceParty), Franz Obermayr and Andreas Mölzer (Austrian FPÖ), Kent Ekeroth (Sweden Democrats), Thorsten Gross (Bürger in Wut, Germany), Rolandas Paksas and Juozas Imbrasas (Lithuanian Order and Justice party).


Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, 29 October 2010

British Democracy Forum PLAYING CATCH-UP ON UKIP NEWS! 29-Oct-2010

#1
Trusted Member Barboo is doing well

Join Date
Mar 2007
Posts
715

Default European Alliance for Freedom

GLW has a posted a memo from Tim Congdon re the creation of a new pan-European party to be called 'European Alliance for Freedom', and UKIP's possible involvement in this project. Included in the memo is an e-mail from a Sharon Ellul Bonici stating that the European Alliance hopes to become strong in the 2014 Euro-elections, and that MEPs can join either as a Party or as individuals. Godfrey Bloom is listed among those who have confirmed their intention of doing so.

UKIP MEPs sought election on an unequivocal platform of withdrawal from the EU. It is what party members and supporters worked for, contributed funds for, and what the electorate voted for. 'Campaign policies Euro elections 2009', posted to UKIP's website on 8 May 2009, stated: "The UK Independence Party believes that the UK should withdraw from the European Union". 'Campaign letter from UKIP Leader Nigel Farage MEP', posted 11 May 2009, began: "The UK Independence Party is the only moderate, democratic party to advocate Britain's withdrawal from the European Union", and continued: "On June 4, please lend us your vote. Say No to European Union and help UKIP ensure that the future of our nation is decided by those of us who live here. There can surely no longer be any question that Britain would be better off out".

Withdrawal from the EU was and still is UKIP's policy and principle aim, and its MEPs have no mandate from the party or the electorate to sit in the European parliament and speak, vote on or represent anything else.

UKIP MEPs' alliance with those of other, non-withdrawalist, parties in their EP group has always been contentious, but the nature of EP groupings is a loose one whereby the parliament's rules assume (but do not require proof of) political affinity between group members, unless they state otherwise. In addition, the EFD's political platform is vague and allows its different delegations the freedom to vote as they see fit, a freedom which is taken full advantage of with other EFD members frequently voting in favour of motions on which UKIP's MEPs abstain or vote against.

This will not apply to members of a pan-EU party, and those who join the European Alliance will not simply be 'assumed' to have political affinity. In order to be approved as a political party and granted EP funding they will have to agree common objectives and draw up a political programme to work to, which they will have to submit with their funding application. Any change to that programme must be notified to the parliament or the funding will be suspended.

None of the parties or individuals named in the Bonici e-mail, other than Godfrey Bloom, are withdrawalists. They are reformists who wish to remain in the EU and whose political programme will reflect that intention. Even the name adopted by the new party makes no reference to independence or anything else that might suggest withdrawal. Indeed, a European Alliance for Freedom does no more than echo the EU's own description of itself as 'an area of freedom, security and justice'. Any UKIP MEPs joining this party will in effect have crossed the floor to pursue political objectives for which they have no mandate.

They cannot in these circumstances continue to be regarded as UKIP MEPs, and for the party to keep faith with its members and its electorate it will have to expel any MEP who joins the European Alliance for Freedom.
To view the original on what was The UKIP Forum now risibly called The British Democracy Forum CLICK HERE
Enhanced by Zemanta